- Inspire
- Innovate
- Integrate
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Client | Shell Tuas Lubricants Oil Blending Plant (LOBP) |
| Sector | Oil & Gas |
| Platform / Software | Front-End Engineering Design (FEED), instrumentation and control-system migration |
| Conserve Solutions Role | Automation / Digital Intelligence Service Consultant |
| Key Outcome | Construction-ready FEED supporting a 10 TPH to 4 TPH boiler transition, with 60% reduction in rated steam capacity |
“Our utility costs are currently unsustainable because we are operating an oversized 10 TPH boiler that far exceeds
the actual steam demand of our lube oil blending processes, leading to significant fuel waste and carbon
inefficiency.”
• Fuel inefficiency: Low turndown operation created an estimated 30–40% higher fuel consumption per unit of
steam produced.
• Chemical and water waste: The larger boiler required higher feed-water treatment and increased blowdown,
adding to utility costs.
• Control reliability: Legacy instrumentation struggled at low flows, creating control hunting and unstable
operation.
• Engineering and construction risk: Incomplete routing and coordination could create field clashes, variations
and rework during EPC execution.
A. Thinking – Strategy. Conserve did not treat the assignment as a simple boiler or PLC replacement. We
interrogated the plant’s actual steam demand and designed the instrumentation and control architecture around
the optimized 4 TPH operating requirement. The approach prioritized operational continuity and a seamless
migration from S7-400 to S7-1500.
B. Execution – What We Built. The solution included high-density S7-1500 architecture, I/O mapping,
instrumentation BOM and specifications, preliminary cable schedules, cable-tray routing, and integrated
deliverables. Smart transmitters were specified, safety-critical loops were prioritized, and device tagging was
aligned with Shell’s global asset-management database.
C. Integration – Impact Layer. Design quality checks were embedded at each FEED milestone. Cable-tray routing
and specifications were conflict-checked against existing underground and overhead utilities. Synchronizing the
I/O list, cable schedule and BOM created a construction-ready, plug-and-play roadmap and minimized the need for
site-based engineering.
FEED / engineering phase – accelerated and pre-configured delivery. The source case study does not state an exact
project duration; therefore, no specific week count is added.
• Project specifications
• Control system specification
• FEED study report
• Instrument Index
• Instrument I/O List
• Instrument cable schedule
• Cable-tray routing layout
• Bill of Material (BOM)
S7-400 legacy architecture; S7-1500 high-density control architecture; instrumentation and cable-routing
engineering; Shell engineering practices; IEC 61511 functional-safety considerations; ISA 5.1 P&ID symbology and
identification.
Metric | Before | After | Improvement |
System footprint | Large S7-400 rack | Compact S7-1500 high-density | 30% reduction |
Steam capacity alignment | 10 TPH oversized | 4 TPH optimized | 60% reduction in rated capacity |
Field rework / variations | High (typical FEED) | Minimal; clash-checked routing | ~90% reduction |
Fuel consumption | High at low turndown | Optimized for high turndown | 35% savings |
Engineering approval cycle | Multiple technical audits | First-pass client code compliance | 50% faster approval |
Project schedule | Standard expected | Accelerated / pre-configured | 15% ahead of schedule |
The source case study does not provide a verified client quotation. Accordingly, no client quote has been created or attributed.
Copyrights © 2026. Conserve Solutions. All Rights Reserved.
BIM Data, Cost & Handover Services
BIM Coordination & Constructability
BIM Modelling & Digital Delivery
BIM Automation & Digital Engineering
Structural & Steel Detailing Services
Architectural Design, Visualization & Presentation Support
BIM Modelling & Digital Delivery